| Peer-Reviewed

Impact of Traders Competitive Rivalry on Supply and Demand Relations in Livestock Markets in the Drylands of Kenya

Received: 19 May 2021     Accepted: 1 June 2021     Published: 10 June 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Globally, the livestock sector is rapidly growing and contributing 40% of the total value of agricultural output. Livestock keeping is one of the main vibrant economic sectors in many Africa countries. In Kenya, livestock contributes 12% to the national Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and 42% to Agricultural GDP. 80% of Kenya’s landmass is Arid and Semi-Arid, home of about 16 million people dependent on agro-pastoral livelihoods. Though the largest Kenya region, Turkana County is the poorest, with 70% of the population depending entirely on livestock keeping. While many impediments retard the development of livestock in Kenya’s drylands, using the case of Turkana County, the study objectives focused on the effects of competitive rivalry evident in many markets and its effects on the supply and demand relations, and the impact of theory integration on the supply and demand in markets. 168 primary respondents (Livestock traders) and 24 secondary respondents (Government and Civil Society employees) were sampled to participate in the study. The study results showed that competitive rivalry significantly influences supply and demand relations in livestock markets in the pastoral areas, hindering the adoption of formal business models for market organization, functionality, and better performance. As a result, livestock prices, marketing and market governance systems, coordination of livestock trade in the county, and access to cross-border markets remain negatively affected. Recommendations for application include empowerment of traders, youth, and women through business training, exposure, and introduction of adult literacy programmes to help improve the ability of the local traders to read, write, and use technology to share market information, and do transactions. Access to capital financing, infrastructure development, and organization of marketing performance will reinforce linkages between livestock production zones and various market segments. Strengthening the governance of livestock markets by promoting leadership and management practices, and enforcement of business principles will inculcate in markets ethical competition while rooting out rivalry tendencies. Supply, demand, and theory integration in livestock trade remain critical areas for future research. Despite many limitations to the growth of livestock economy in pastoral areas, the drylands still pose significant opportunities to nurture healthy and productive livestock resources that can compete in internal and external markets while attracting substantial economic returns to empower rural economies, strengthen entrepreneurship, and make pastoral livelihoods more resilient.

Published in International Journal of Business and Economics Research (Volume 10, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijber.20211003.13
Page(s) 99-109
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Competition, Rivalry, Supply, Demand, Business Models, Market Systems

References
[1] FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP and WHO. (2020). The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2020. Transforming food systems for affordable healthy diets. Rome, FAO. ISBN: 978-92-5-132901-6. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/ca9692en.
[2] Ryschawy, J., Disenhaus, C., & Bertrand, S. et al. (2017). Assessing multiple goods and services derived from livestock farming on a nation-wide gradient. Animal 2017; 11: 1861–72.
[3] Veysset, P., Benoit, M., & Laignel, G. et al. (2014). Analysis and determinants of the evolution of the performance of sheep for meat and suckler cattle farms in less favored areas from 1990 to 2012. INRA Prod Anim 2014; 27: 49–64.
[4] Berihun, T. (2017). Livestock Marketing Performance Evaluation in the Afar Region, Ethiopia. International Journal of Agricultural Marketing, 4 (2): 152-160. Retrieved from https://premierpublishers.org/ijam/160620177736.
[5] Devaux, A., Torero, M., Donovan, J., & Horton, D. (2018). Agricultural innovation and inclusive value-chain development: a review, Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies; Bingley Vol. 8 (1): 99-123. DOI: 10.1108/JADEE-06-2017-0065.
[6] Mahmoud, H. A. (2008). Risky trade, resilient traders: Trust and livestock marketing in Northern Kenya. Africa (pe-2011); Edinburgh Vol. 78, Iss. 4, (2008): 561-581. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/central/docview/213650781/fulltextPDF/1698D54BD9B04533PQ/1?accountid=188730.
[7] Watson, D. J., and van Binsbergen, J. (2008). Livestock market access and opportunities in Turkana, Kenya. ILRI Research Report 3. ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute), Nairobi, Kenya. pp. 106. Retrieved from https://cgspace.cgiar.org/bitstream/handle/10568/238/Res_report_no3.pdf?sequence=1.
[8] Abebe, B. D., Tadie, M. A., & Taye, M. M. (2018). Factors affecting market outlet choice of wheat producers in North Gondar Zone, Ethiopia. Agriculture & Food Security; London Vol. 7. DOI: 10.1186/s40066-018-0241-x.
[9] Roba, G. M., Lelea, M. A., Hensel, O., & Kaufmann, B. (2019). Elusive Profits: Understanding the economic performance of local traders in the pastoral small ruminant value chain in northern Kenya Nomadic Peoples; Isle of Harris Vol. 23 (1): 78-105. DOI: 10.3197/np.2019.230105.
[10] Stanimir, M. (2014). Factors Influencing the Degree of Competition in the Telecom Industry. Dept. of Strategic Planning, D. A. Tsenov Academy of Economics, Bulgaria. ISSN: 2278-3369.
[11] Akenbor, C. O., & Okoye, E. I. (2011). An Empirical Investigation of Value-Chain Analysis and Competitive Advantage in the Nigerian Manufacturing Industry. International Multidisciplinary Journal, Ethiopia 5 (6) 188-198.
[12] Asfaw, A. A. (2018). Prevalence and economic significance of bovine fasciolosis in Bale Rural Abattoir, Ethiopia. Academy of Agriculture Journal 3 (9): 541-550. http://www.innovativejournal.in/index.php/aaj/article/view/2286
[13] Gupta, A. (2013). Environment & PEST Analysis: An Approach to External Business Environment. International Journal of Modern Social Sciences, 2013, 2 (1): 34-43.
[14] Harzing, A. W., & Giroud, A. (2013). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. An application to Academia. Journal of Informetrics, pp. 23. Retrieved from https://harzing.com/download/diamond.pdf.
[15] Ndanga, L. Z. B., Quagrainie, K., Ngugi, C. C., & Amadiva, J. (2015). Application of Porter’s Framework to Assess Aquaculture Value Chain in Kenya. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development, 15 (3). 10118 – 10137.
[16] Catley, A., Burns, J., Abebe, D., & Suji, O. (2007). Participatory Impact Assessment: A guide for practitioners. Tufts University, Gerald J. and Dorothy R. Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, pp. 58. Retrieved from http://fic.tufts.edu/assets/PIA-guide_revised-2014-3.pdf.
[17] Yiram, H., Ahmed, M., & Mohamed, S. (2017). Livestock Marketing: Local beliefs and clan conflicts in focus. African Journal of Marketing Management. Vol, 9, No. 1, pp 1-7. DOI: 10.5897/AJMM2015.0452.
[18] Watson, D. J., & van Binsbergen, J. (2008). Livestock Market Access and Opportunities in Turkana, Kenya. ILRI Research Report 3. ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute), Nairobi, Kenya. pp. 106. Retrieved from https://cgspace.cgiar.org/bitstream/handle/10568/238/Res_report_no3.pdf?sequence=1.
[19] Kyeyamwa, H., Verbeke, W., Speelman, S., Opuda-Asibo, J., & Van Huylenbroeck, G. (2008). Structure and Dynamics of Livestock Marketing in Rural Uganda: Constraints and Prospects of Research and Development. Journal of International Food and Agribusiness Marketing, Vol. 20 (4): 59-89. DOI: 10.1080/08974430802355523.
[20] Isako, T., Kimindu, V., Amboga, S., & Tuke, G. (2019). Pastoral Livestock Marketing: A Case Study of Marsabit County, Kenya. Journal of Natural Sciences Research, Vol. 9 (6): 51-57. DOI: 10.7176/JNSR.
[21] McPeak, J., & Barret, C. B. (2001). Differential Risk Exposure and Stochastic Poverty Traps among East African Pastoralists. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 83 (4): 674-679.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Ekiru Francis Anno, Pjero Beqiraj Elenica. (2021). Impact of Traders Competitive Rivalry on Supply and Demand Relations in Livestock Markets in the Drylands of Kenya. International Journal of Business and Economics Research, 10(3), 99-109. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20211003.13

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Ekiru Francis Anno; Pjero Beqiraj Elenica. Impact of Traders Competitive Rivalry on Supply and Demand Relations in Livestock Markets in the Drylands of Kenya. Int. J. Bus. Econ. Res. 2021, 10(3), 99-109. doi: 10.11648/j.ijber.20211003.13

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Ekiru Francis Anno, Pjero Beqiraj Elenica. Impact of Traders Competitive Rivalry on Supply and Demand Relations in Livestock Markets in the Drylands of Kenya. Int J Bus Econ Res. 2021;10(3):99-109. doi: 10.11648/j.ijber.20211003.13

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijber.20211003.13,
      author = {Ekiru Francis Anno and Pjero Beqiraj Elenica},
      title = {Impact of Traders Competitive Rivalry on Supply and Demand Relations in Livestock Markets in the Drylands of Kenya},
      journal = {International Journal of Business and Economics Research},
      volume = {10},
      number = {3},
      pages = {99-109},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijber.20211003.13},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20211003.13},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijber.20211003.13},
      abstract = {Globally, the livestock sector is rapidly growing and contributing 40% of the total value of agricultural output. Livestock keeping is one of the main vibrant economic sectors in many Africa countries. In Kenya, livestock contributes 12% to the national Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and 42% to Agricultural GDP. 80% of Kenya’s landmass is Arid and Semi-Arid, home of about 16 million people dependent on agro-pastoral livelihoods. Though the largest Kenya region, Turkana County is the poorest, with 70% of the population depending entirely on livestock keeping. While many impediments retard the development of livestock in Kenya’s drylands, using the case of Turkana County, the study objectives focused on the effects of competitive rivalry evident in many markets and its effects on the supply and demand relations, and the impact of theory integration on the supply and demand in markets. 168 primary respondents (Livestock traders) and 24 secondary respondents (Government and Civil Society employees) were sampled to participate in the study. The study results showed that competitive rivalry significantly influences supply and demand relations in livestock markets in the pastoral areas, hindering the adoption of formal business models for market organization, functionality, and better performance. As a result, livestock prices, marketing and market governance systems, coordination of livestock trade in the county, and access to cross-border markets remain negatively affected. Recommendations for application include empowerment of traders, youth, and women through business training, exposure, and introduction of adult literacy programmes to help improve the ability of the local traders to read, write, and use technology to share market information, and do transactions. Access to capital financing, infrastructure development, and organization of marketing performance will reinforce linkages between livestock production zones and various market segments. Strengthening the governance of livestock markets by promoting leadership and management practices, and enforcement of business principles will inculcate in markets ethical competition while rooting out rivalry tendencies. Supply, demand, and theory integration in livestock trade remain critical areas for future research. Despite many limitations to the growth of livestock economy in pastoral areas, the drylands still pose significant opportunities to nurture healthy and productive livestock resources that can compete in internal and external markets while attracting substantial economic returns to empower rural economies, strengthen entrepreneurship, and make pastoral livelihoods more resilient.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Impact of Traders Competitive Rivalry on Supply and Demand Relations in Livestock Markets in the Drylands of Kenya
    AU  - Ekiru Francis Anno
    AU  - Pjero Beqiraj Elenica
    Y1  - 2021/06/10
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20211003.13
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijber.20211003.13
    T2  - International Journal of Business and Economics Research
    JF  - International Journal of Business and Economics Research
    JO  - International Journal of Business and Economics Research
    SP  - 99
    EP  - 109
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2328-756X
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20211003.13
    AB  - Globally, the livestock sector is rapidly growing and contributing 40% of the total value of agricultural output. Livestock keeping is one of the main vibrant economic sectors in many Africa countries. In Kenya, livestock contributes 12% to the national Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and 42% to Agricultural GDP. 80% of Kenya’s landmass is Arid and Semi-Arid, home of about 16 million people dependent on agro-pastoral livelihoods. Though the largest Kenya region, Turkana County is the poorest, with 70% of the population depending entirely on livestock keeping. While many impediments retard the development of livestock in Kenya’s drylands, using the case of Turkana County, the study objectives focused on the effects of competitive rivalry evident in many markets and its effects on the supply and demand relations, and the impact of theory integration on the supply and demand in markets. 168 primary respondents (Livestock traders) and 24 secondary respondents (Government and Civil Society employees) were sampled to participate in the study. The study results showed that competitive rivalry significantly influences supply and demand relations in livestock markets in the pastoral areas, hindering the adoption of formal business models for market organization, functionality, and better performance. As a result, livestock prices, marketing and market governance systems, coordination of livestock trade in the county, and access to cross-border markets remain negatively affected. Recommendations for application include empowerment of traders, youth, and women through business training, exposure, and introduction of adult literacy programmes to help improve the ability of the local traders to read, write, and use technology to share market information, and do transactions. Access to capital financing, infrastructure development, and organization of marketing performance will reinforce linkages between livestock production zones and various market segments. Strengthening the governance of livestock markets by promoting leadership and management practices, and enforcement of business principles will inculcate in markets ethical competition while rooting out rivalry tendencies. Supply, demand, and theory integration in livestock trade remain critical areas for future research. Despite many limitations to the growth of livestock economy in pastoral areas, the drylands still pose significant opportunities to nurture healthy and productive livestock resources that can compete in internal and external markets while attracting substantial economic returns to empower rural economies, strengthen entrepreneurship, and make pastoral livelihoods more resilient.
    VL  - 10
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • School of Doctoral Studies, Unicaf University, Larnaca, Cyprus

  • Department of Business, Faculty of Economics, University ‘Ismail Qemali’, Vlore, Albania

  • Sections